Reader Submissions: 1981 Lotus Esprit Turbo: Get One While You Can Still Afford It

1981 Lotus Esprit Turbo: Get One While You Can Still Afford It

By Flavien Vidal
November 22, 2016
13 comments

Not many cars have that supercar look yet manage to stay surprisingly affordable. This 1981 Lotus Esprit Turbo is a prime example. Sold last week for a mere $30,000 with only 18,600 miles on the clock, I managed to spend a few hours with it before its new owner came to pick it up. But other than looking good, what else do these notoriously unreliable cars have to offer?

It was the James Bond car that went “Boom” after enjoying one measly minute on the silver screen in For Your Eyes Only before being quickly replaced by a Citroen 2CV. What a glorious career start.

Despite looking like what a seven year old might come up with when asked to draw a fast car, the S3 was originally designed by Giugiaro and was its last incarnation before its redesign in 1987. But this particular Esprit, in spite of a very low mileage, has seen some action. It was more of a slumdog than a garage queen. Left untouched, under the sun for years, the low quality leather of the dashboard was left to burn, day after day. When I first saw the car and noticed how dirty it was despite its low mileage, I felt my heart breaking. I wanted to give it a big hug and whisper into its vents that everything would be alright and that she’d get to see her Japanese touges again.

Luckily the work required was mostly cosmetic and thanks to Japanese weather the chassis rust was non-existent. After a massive clean-up and an oil change, the engine started perfectly, which was a bit surprising for something handmade in the UK during the 80’s… Over the next couple of weeks, the fluids were replaced, the AC was refilled and the sun-burnt dashboard leather was replaced. Finally we were go to go for a first stress test-drive.

When you first sit behind the wheel, the S3 doesn’t strike you as being a car that was once worth $115,000 in today’s money. It’s got gaps everywhere, the air vents look like they were pushed into the metal, the seats are so narrow it leaves you thinking they were built for Carole Bouquet and not Roger Moore and it’s got gauges that could have come straight from the 1981 Renault catalogue of  soulless, hard black plastic fittings.

But once you stop focusing on minor details and start looking through the windshield, all those inner voices and guffaws at British manufacturing suddenly disappear. Holy shit, you’re behind the wheel of a supercar. Everything is oriented toward the driving experience. You’re sitting low, brake and gas pedals are ideally positioned. The clutch is light but not too light and the steering wheel doesn’t feel like those bulky modern things that people still use to turn right or left. You’re a rock star.

My first cold start went well. The Dell’Orto carburetors fed the 210hp/200lb.ft inline 4 engine in a couple of tries. I was quickly reminded that I was living in Japan and that the car is sub-optimal in terms of width  for this country. These roads are tight. People look at you like you’re some alien from outer space. But at least the car is easy to drive slowly and doesn’t jump around in first gear. You don’t look like a complete rookie crawling along in traffic, like you would if you were sweltering in the heat like you might in some V12 supercars from this car’s period.

Of course it’s outside the city where the car really get  to shine. It’s nimble, the steering is very responsive, with no deadzone like in most (all?) regular 80’s vehicles. It jumps from corner to corner with quite an incredible agility for a car built by the same people who couldn’t be bothered to pre-drill body panels before screwing them together. The gearbox, however, which comes straight out of a Citroen SM was not in great condition, and I suspect that the 2nd gear synchro won’t see many more days.

Once you start pushing it a little, you’re reminded of the lack of limited slip differential as the rear suddenly snaps from under you. Anything over a few degrees of slip angle on a corner exit and you’ll be introducing yourself to the nearest tree. Nonetheless, the car has a very neutral behavior. You won’t find yourself fighting with the steering like a maniac unless you really want to. The turbo lag is progressive for a car of this era and doesn’t catch you by surprise like, for example, a R5 Turbo would. This is helpful when for avoiding sticky ends.

Overall, I truly think this is one of the most underrated cars ever produced. It’s hard to believe you could buy these for $5-10,000 just 5 years ago. When driving it, I couldn’t help but have a little thought for the base model 1991-1995 NSX which didn’t have a working clutch plate LSD (Where’s my flame suit?). The Lotus Esprit Turbo S3 is better.

There, I’ve said it. And I’ll say it again. The Lotus Esprit Turbo S3 is better.

Sure it will fall apart in no time and the build quality is not even comparable, but the driving experience? Both cars are just as sketchy over the limit but the Lotus is 550 lbs lighter, making it nimbler at lower speeds. When the NSX produces this fairly typical German saloon-car type of acceleration, the Lotus gets you with turbo boost, carburetors gurgling and waste-gate noises. When the NSX makes you think about what you could do in order to gain that extra 0.3s at your local autocross event, the Lotus wants you to stop snorting coke and come back to your garage to find what relay is failing again. And once you’ve fixed it, you’ll want to drive it in a way that’ll mean something else will break in no time. And you’ll give zero fucks about lap times.

The Lotus really is that good… when it works.

Join the Conversation
Related
0 0 votes
Article Rating
13 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter J Smith
Peter J Smith
3 years ago

You could have had a V8.

Yohann L
Yohann L
4 years ago

I really don’t understand why this car has a bad reputation… I own one for 3 years now, and this car is amazingly reliable!!! I drive it almost every sunny week-end, and it’s a pleasure. I did a roadtrip from Paris to Maranello, then Geneva and back to Paris
with this car and guess what…….. I enjoyed and have been smilling all the way!!! This car is a classic car and needs to be maintained and driven, that’s it.
In my mind, the problem is, as the car used to be affordable, some people bought it for almost nothing and didn’t give their cars the care it deserves. Which leaded to “not reliable” cars….
This car is just the perfect car for my days off, and I am glad to have bought one before prices skyrockets, because it’s gonna happen. Just look at this beauty!!!! 😍😍😍😍

Eduardo Palandi
Eduardo Palandi
5 years ago

I much prefer the design of the S4 to the S3’s. that said, an S3 in John Player Special livery would be a beautiful thing in my garage…

Paul
Paul
5 years ago

😉

Ian
Ian
4 years ago

S3 was never made in JPS colours. The JPS cars, of which there were around 100, were a variation of the S2

Christian Bozeat
Christian Bozeat
5 years ago

Have you ever Fri en it owned a 308 Ferrari? My 308 now well gone thanks, makes my 85 turbo look brilliant. You think any super car from the 80s is any good they are all crap which is why presumably you compared it to a 90s car! Drive a 308 that has sat for years and then had minimal work before you get in and rag it about! I agree with some other comments made the reliability stuff makes you look rather I’ll informed and certainly not a classic owner my dad has more rubble with his type and is merc 280 so than I have with my esprit! If you love the drive of it and it is good. Buy one and you will never let it go. PS check your tyre pressure they are much lower than you think and you should find the back stay put longer than just about any thing. Mr Chapman was quite good at the handling thing you know. Some might say a genius.

Greg P
Greg P
4 years ago

“You think any super car from the 80s is any good they are all crap….”

No, try a Porsche 3.2 Carrera. They’re lovely cars to drive, ultra reliable (I used mine as a daily driver for 7 years from 2003-10). As a previous poster states, cars need to be maintained and like to be driven.

Brady Wedding
Brady Wedding
5 years ago

One of my favourite Lotus models they ever released, still trying to find a nice one over here…
In the meantime I went and bought the New Zealand version, smaller and Fiat Twin Cam powered.
Heron MJ1 – 1986
http://heroncars.co.nz

Paul Fowler
Paul Fowler
5 years ago

It would appear that people who generally remark on the Esprit have never actually owned one. Reliability is no better or worse than any other car that is maintained correctly. The reality is that the previous owners of the cars are generally the issue. Whilst they are comparatively cheap in super car terms, they still cost super car money to run and generally the issues arise where owners avoid spending the money to service regularly, cut corners or just plain dont bother and run them into the ground. I’ve owned Esprit’s for over two decades and never had any major issues. Ill-informed people perpetuate a myth and it sticks. If looked after the cars are great. Build quality is a subjective matter, but these cars were hand built to all intent and purposes. Guitar Slinger is wrong that everything breaks. There are areas to look out for with any model or make or car, but at least have some perspective. No fix, no resto? Poppycock fella. There are specialists and parts are generally plentiful if not readily available from dealers for the more obscure and bespoke parts. The cars are starting to appreciate in value in Europe and $30000 won’t go far for very long at all. If your going to buy one get informed from people that own cars, not speculators that really can’t differentiate between the reality of what makes any car an issue if it’s not looked after. Don’t forget, the earliest S1 is over 40 years old now. Whatever legacy an Esprit had, will generally have been sorted by owners who look after their appreciating asset, used or otherwise. If you buy a dog and you didn’t expect it, then you didn’t do your homework. Don’t expect them to be cheap compared to a family car because they’re not, but they are not the horror story in terms of reliability that is set out here 🙂

Flavien Vidal
Flavien Vidal
5 years ago
Reply to  Paul Fowler

Mechanically it’s a strong car. What can be annoying are electrics. It’s just not good and poorly made. The kind of thing that is cheap to fix but hard to diagnose. This is the reason why this car gets such a bad rep. It can get you stranded on the side of the road because an electric cable decided it didn’t want to stay attached onto that fuse box. But engine, carbs, gearbox or drivetrain are very reliable to the point it could be easily daily driven.

Greg P
Greg P
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul Fowler

Lovely looking Esprit. Is it an S4S?

Guitar Slinger
Guitar Slinger
5 years ago

You may be able to afford the purchase price . But guaranteed .. you cannot afford the maintenance upkeep and repairs . Everything on them breaks … constantly .. unlike Pantera’s there is no ‘ fix ‘ or resto mod route to go down .. so unless you’re going to stuff it in a collection / garage and forget about it …. just say

No ! Much as it pains me to say that …. sigh …….. Colin Chapman and Lotus in general . Quality control never was and still isn’t .. their forte .

Flavien Vidal
Flavien Vidal
5 years ago
Reply to  Guitar Slinger

If you can wrench on your own, the car isn’t bad at all… It’s fairly easy to work on and mechanically strong. Of course electrics will fail at some point or another, but the car is basic enough so that it won’t be difficult to fix it. The build quality itself is average, but these are cosmetic problems. At the end of the day, it’s a carbureted car like many other and gets fixed like many other.