Journal: Driven by Design: Citröen 2CV

Driven by Design: Citröen 2CV

By Yoav Gilad
April 18, 2014

(This article is part of the Driven by Design series.)

Photography by Afshin Behnia for Petrolicious

There are some cars that are so visually striking, capturing the essence of motion so fundamentally that they stop you in your tracks. This is not one of them. The Citröen 2CV, or Deux Chevaux-Vapeur, is however so cunningly simple and elegant that it is a design icon. From the outset it was envisioned as a French Ford Model T, designed to mobilize the entire nation.

The Michelin family, who had taken controlling interest in the bankrupt Citröen brand, developed the 2CV, beginning in the mid-1930s because they believed that more expensive, upmarket cars were responsible for Citröen’s failure to begin with. Michelin thought that by making cars cheaper and available to many more people, the company would thrive.

The design brief is well known: space for four, carry fifty kg (110 lbs) of cargo, a fuel economy of three liters (about ¾ of a gallon) of fuel per hundred kilometers (about 78 mpg), and the ability to cross a plowed field with a basket of eggs surviving in tact, on the seat. It also had to be capable of hitting fifty km/h. But what more obscure is that Mr. Pierre-Jules Boulanger, Chief of Engineering and Design for Citröen, chose engineers that had qualified through night school courses, over university trained ones. According to Mr. John Reynolds, author of Citröen 2CV, if you’ll pardon the cliché, Boulanger believed that necessity was the mother of invention and thus, men with humbler backgrounds would have more innovative solutions and greater practical experience rather than those who had enjoyed a more privileged upbringing.

The project continued to develop (over forty prototypes were built (!)), was halted by World War II when the cars and project were hidden from the Germans due to a fear that they might find a military application, and finally jump started after the liberation.

Rather than proceeding through the usual aesthetic analysis though, I’d rather discuss some of the Citröen’s engineering innovations, as they are what made the 2CV such a wonderful car. Most famous and noteworthy is the suspension that was a four-wheel independent type. But it didn’t have a sporting focus, rather it was chosen to allow for the car to glide over bumps without losing contact with the surface (a direct result of Mr. André Lefèbvre’s, former Grand Prix designer and racer, involvement) and used a leading-/trailing-arm set up. This design endowed it with a much lower unsprung weight than traditional coil or leaf arrangements. It was also designed to be extremely soft to absorb rough terrain.

This layout also allowed for the rear tires to be changed without removing the fender skirts. Due to its design, the suspension also adjusted to varying weights automatically, Mr. Reynolds says that, “four people and cargo on board the wheelbase increases by around 4 cm (2 in) as the suspension deflects, and the castor angle of the front wheels increases by as much as 8 degrees thus ensuring that ride quality, handling and road holding is almost unaffected by the additional weight.”

Additionally, the front brakes are mounted inboard to reduce unsprung weight. The powertrain is front-wheel drive with the relatively light engine mounted fore of the front wheels to improve driveability and directional stability. Not only did all of these factors improve the cars driving characteristics in accordance with the brief, but they also helped serviceability and made the cars relatively durable. To this end, the rack-and-pinion steering rack was tucked inside of the front suspension cross tube, well behind the front tires to protect it in an impact. Also, nearly all of the body panels were removable including the fenders, doors, cloth roof, hood, and [later] trunk. It was possible to essentially convert your 2CV into a pickup truck.

Windows were two-piece and hinged in the middle to save weight and complexity. Amazingly, the 2CV remained in production for forty-two years! It finally succumbed when it was no longer remotely competitive with modern cars in terms of speed and acceleration. Perhaps even more incredible is that the design was somehow still competitive in the early 1980s, in terms of safety, due to its engineered front crumple zone.

The little Citröen has many nicknames, the majority derisive and based on its appearance. I certainly won’t defend its Quonset appearance—but there is beauty in function and durability as well. And that being the case, the Citröen 2CV is a supermodel.

White 2CV Image Source: 4starclassics.com

Join the Conversation
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Martin La Grange
Martin La Grange
10 years ago

In terms of design, the 2CV had some noteworthy features that deserve a second look today, as well as some charming ones which betoken a very generous French concern for the fairer sex….

One of the design briefs for a car that (at the time) was to be started for base models by a crank starter, was the lowest possible kickback force in the event of a non-crank, so that Madame would not break her nails, or sprain her wrist – most genteel.
Further, in the era of the high head-dress (beehives etc.), the roofline of les Deux Chevaux was designed again in such a way that Madame, when entering either the front or rear door, would not have her hat knocked off and her hair knocked askance.

Further, the design of the doors was such that if Madame’s dress were fouling the closure, then door would not willingly close.

Should Madame be driving, as was often the case, then the seating arrangement and placement of controls provided the best possible comfort for a respectable lady to access the controls, and have confidence at the wheel. Finally, the instrument panel was a model of simplicity and legibility, both at night and by day, enhancing safety and usability.

I am not aware of any modern car with such a concern for our lovely ladies – I doff my Beret to Messrs Lemoenman for the 2CV, it is sublimely fun. And how many lovely little cars like this have been stars of James Bond films ? Sir Roger Moore expressed his delight in that this was the only film car that if you got a bump or a scrape – no one cared at all !

Evan
Evan
10 years ago

Did I just read that the 2CV was a safe car?! A funny iconic car, yes! But safe would be a bit much? Yes most drivers had knees so I guess you could say it got crumple-zones, but with the whole car made in metal thinner than tinfoil, safe isn’t the first thing that comes to my mind. 🙂
Great article 😀

Todd Cox
Todd Cox
10 years ago

I love exotics as much as the next guy, but they have much more bland and predictable stories: Bought by wealthy businessmen for their performance or as trophies, and then they were raced or stored. Very few exotics lead a different life.

I’ve always appreciated a ‘working’ car. And I’m not talking about mass-produced Reliant K-cars or Toyota Tercels. I’m talking about cars developed creatively out of necessity; a car made from a seemingly random batch of creative and innovative solutions to automotive problems, cobbled together in a sort of hodge-podge to arrive at a creation that is much more than the sum of its parts. Working cars like this are the cars with the real stories; they are the cars we relate to. They chugged along through countless joys and tragedies, and probably seemed like a small footnote at the time, but have made amazing things happen. It is the working car that changes the world, not the thoroughbred exotic.

Thanks for another great article. I’d love to drive one of these, if not own one, some day.

Ae Neuman
Ae Neuman
10 years ago

checkout chris harris’ take on the 2cv
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76ktMcCDZvk

🙂

Gonzalo
10 years ago

great and funny car,
in south america we call “patito” (little duck)…or ranita (little frog).

JB21
JB21
10 years ago

2CV, 4, Beetle, 500, even Mini…They all belong to the different era, when the expectation about cars were vastly different from what it is today. And all of them massively engaging to drive (yes, even Beetle), not by design, but all sort of kind of by accident. It’s so very different from today where designer actually tries to design cars “fun”.

Thomas
Thomas
10 years ago

my thoughts exactly. I had 4 of them in Europe, when I was younger (the 4th was also my first brand new car). I drove them all over Europe, even crossed the Alps, slow but without a problem. In my student years I also managed almost all of my moves with them. Rear seat is out in a minute or so and voila, with the roof all the way rolled back, I had a quite huge cargo space.
One wanted to have a romantic picnic, not a problem, within 5 minutes all seats are out of the car and they function as camping seats.
Only bad side of the car, you had to start rust prevention right away after purchase.
Last year and after 28 years without, I finally closed the circle and purchased a 2CV here in LA. I am now enjoying it as an occasional daily driver 🙂

Dustin Rittle
Dustin Rittle
10 years ago

I always believed the Citroen 2CV was a very iconic car along with the Model T, VW Beetle and the Mini. It was a small innovative car but with a utilitarian construction and vibe to it. The very ingenious design is only rivaled by the Ford Model T. What you had was a simple, low price, reliability car that would take the day in and day out beating of life or whatever you could throw at it. Like I have always said a great car with great engineering doesn’t always have to be in super exotic car form. The greatest example of this is the Citroen 2CV. keep up the great work guys

Petrolicious Newsletter