Featured: This Is What It's Like To Drive Superformance's Greatest Recreations

This Is What It’s Like To Drive Superformance’s Greatest Recreations

By Ted Gushue
March 3, 2016

When someone offers you the chance to get behind the wheel of a Chevrolet-licensed replica of one of the rarest Corvettes ever built, the 1963 Grand Sport, you say yes—a word that saw me quickly tearing up the PCH in one of the fastest cars I’ve yet driven.

The “Yes” not only had me in the Corvette Grand Sport by Superformance, but also the chance to compare it to one of the company’s legendary 289 MKII FIA Cobras—the very car that the Corvette Grand Sport was designed to tackle before being dominated by the Ford GT40’s mid engine masterclass at the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

The first thing you notice about the Grand Sport is how remarkably haunchy it is. The car is downright intimidating: its gills are aggressive, the wheels are massive, and the gas pedal is a light switch…attached to a nuclear launch button. This particular one is owned by Ken Lingenfelter, and is, much like its owner, totally mental under the hood. I was told that the reason I would later be handed a $700 speeding ticket by the Sheriff of Malibu was largely due to the fact that Ken had this bad boy set up for drag racing. “Yeah, Ken likes his cars set-up for drag racing.”


The beauty of a Superformance is that you’re driving as close to the original thing as possible, with air conditioning. More importantly, air conditioning that works.

The Cobra, on the other hand, has no use for A/C. It’s a pure, faithful recreation of the original 289 FIA that brought Carroll so much notoriety. The drive is raw, the brakes are faithful throwbacks, and the experience is downright silly fun. Few cars get the eyeball attention of a properly blue Cobra, and after two minutes behind the wheel, I fully understood the appeal.

Before jumping in the driver’s seat, I had a chance to sit down and talk with the CEO of Superformance, a boisterous South African bloke who goes by the name Lance Stander.

Ted Gushue: Lance, tell me a bit about the cars we see here.

Lance Stander: Well, Zora Arkus-Duntov at Chevy wanted to build a Corvette that could compete against the Cobras that were cleaning up in 1962-’63. They were just taking away everything. He went to [his bosses at] Chevrolet and they weren’t terribly interested, so he sort of did it in the back of the shop, quietly. They ended up finishing five of them, but had plans to build 100. Once Chevrolet corporate got wind of them, they shut the whole program down. They were supposed to be crushed, but they got permission to keep the five that they made and sent them out to a few Corvette dealers who raced.

The cars were remarkable because he took the Corvette, which was originally 3,800 pounds and got the car down to roughly 2,000 lbs. Replaced the body with a superlight, incredibly thin fiberglass body, lightened everything, anything that was steel became aluminum, glass was replaced with plastic.

The car became so much faster and lighter that when they would get up around 140 mph the front end effectively became a wing, they wanted to fly. So he started experimenting with aerodynamics, cut a whole bunch of holes in the car, all of the gills you see there. Shaved down the door handles, trying to get the air out from underneath the car.

The cars ultimately were semi successful, but were killed off by Ford releasing the GT40. There was just no way to run a front engined car against a mid-engine.

One of the five routinely comes up to auction, and they fetch north of $12 million Usd., I believe. That’s why we saw the opportunity to create a faithful, licensed replica of the original, to help others share in that car’s special history at a much more reasonable price. And with air conditioning.

Penske took two of the five and chopped off the roofs, made them convertibles and put big block engines in them. They were monsters, they raced really fast.

TG: Do you think you guys will be making a convertible version?

LS: Yes. The convertible version will probably come in about a year’s time. The coupes are remarkably popular so far, we’ve built nine but there are orders for more than 50.

TG: How long does it take to build each one?

LS: It’s about a 4-6 week process, but they do have to ship the full rolling car from South Africa minus the engine and transmission. The new “Low Volume Manufacturers” bill is going to change a lot of that, we’re going to ramp up our US production. Hire a ton more people here in the States.

TG: What cars do you find that you’re not currently reproducing that people request from you.

LS: We get some crazy people who want the 917K Porsche, but we’re not going to sell 10 of those a month, so it won’t work for us. We love that car, but the economics of scale just aren’t there based on market research we’ve done. We get many Porsche requests.

TG: How does all of this work with the companies that hold the trademarks?

LS: That’s the special difference with Superformance. Every single product we make has been licensed and certified by the original manufacturer, and in some cases the designers as well. For instance, our GT40’s are technically considered a continuation of the original production line, it’s not a replica or a kit. It’s an all-steel monocoque, identical to the original car. We’re licensed by GM to build the Grand Sport, our agreement even states that we’re legally obligated not to call it a Superformance reproduction, we have to call it a “Corvette Grand Sport by Superformance”.

TG: Would you be able to get the same level of certification from companies that historically have been against or at least unsupportive of what companies like yours do?

LS: General Motors didn’t come easy. I knocked on their door for eight years. Nothing. Then finally I wore them down I think, and they took the meeting. We have engineers at all of the major manufacturers currently driving Superformance cars, a handful of design heads own one of our cars.

With Porsche, I believe we’re at the point where we can honestly approach them, letting us legally put a Porsche badge on our car. A 356 would be the first product that we’d be looking to build there.

In about five years time, though, I’m hopeful that we’ll crack the big nut.

TG: Which is?

LS: Ferrari. By then I imagine GTOs are fetching $60-70million dollars. But if we put the package together properly, and proved to them that we could build something really special, I think they might be open to the conversation. The car would be our most expensive offering by far, probably around $1m. It will be something special. It would have to have a Ferrari engine. It would have to be done really right. Which is why I don’t believe a truly special Superformance Ferrari GTO would bring the value of the original GTOs down.

Join the Conversation
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

Haha, I love how you mentioned it’s like driving the original but with air condition. After my experience needing a car towing in the summer heat I don’t think I could ever drive a car without air conditioning again, but I’d make an exception for this beauty of course. Great article!

Suzuki Pho Quang
Suzuki Pho Quang
6 years ago

Amazing tool cars, Replaced the body with a superlight, incredibly thin fiberglass body, lightened everything, anything that was steel became aluminum, glass was replaced with plastic. http://www.suzukiphoquang.org/

Karl Muth
8 years ago

I had an SPF coupe and it was a very, very fun car (chassis 0121). Sadly, I sold it and the car was totalled not long thereafter. :/

Keith Walker
Keith Walker
8 years ago

Please, tell me more about the ‘fiberglass frame’, or alternatively, hire a proof reader.

8 years ago

Hey Kurt, lets run our Gt40s together on the track sometime. I have just spent the last year sorting the car, mines RHD sill shift too, with solid mounts on worked 302… Would love some experienced feedback.

Kurt Uzbay
Kurt Uzbay
8 years ago

I am fortunate enough to count a SPF ’66 Gulf GT40 right- hand -drive among my collection. A truly exceptional recreation.
I am an SCCA race car driver- and I have driven an original/provenance/competition GT40 (my client’s), and If I may so bold- there is truly little difference in feel, balance, handling and responsiveness..
My only crime in not owning an original is not having been born in the right decade.. Had I been a 50’s baby instead of a 70’s one, believe me, I would’ve acquired an original, as they were trading hands much cheaper than quality recreations like a Superformance or Gelscoe. if anyone is considering one- don’t delay- you wont regret it.
Best- Kurt

8 years ago

Its good to see petro not being snobs and reckognising recreations as legitimate fun cars. I have a spf Gt40 and for every 5 or so people who see it a great cool car, there is always 1 who has to use the term “fake” and who cant get over what they think must be “legitimnate” to just appreciate what it is, a 60s supercar.

The Bugatti crew always say, where or when it was made does not make a bugatti, How it was made. the materials used and the specifications are what make a bugatti.

its time to differentiate between “kit cars” and licensed recreations. And even then shouldnt we be welcoming all enthusiasts, even if they have a “kit car”

If a Grandsport, cobra or Gt40 are true enough to a period 60s build, then they are essentialy the same thing minus the outrageous price tag and period data plate.

Its ironic that so many old race cars are in reality recreations with very little origional metal left anyway.

One tellign point is all those Gt40s at goodwood. You know a GT40 tub could not have survived from the 60s in racing condition, so where do you think all those new tubs and fiberglass body pieces came from.

In any event, great evocative cars, true enough to the period 60s built ones, to be the same from a driving perspective.

Try one and you will be amazed at how bland even the most “raw” modern is. Try one and you will experience speed. BTW with modern rubber these cars are on track a match for moderns due to their low weight and high Hp. But you have to know how to actualy drive, which I always thought was the point of having fast car.

Recreatiosn allow the meerly well off to experience the greats. Some say they limit the price of origionals. i say at least these cars get driven, and driven in anger and are not multi million dollar parade pieces..

Peter Lukac
Peter Lukac
8 years ago

Beautiful! God, I want the new Miata with classic styled body. Yeah, next to original AC Cobra. 🙂

Guitar Slinger
Guitar Slinger
8 years ago

The beauty of Superformance and all their cars can be summed up in one single word ;

Quality !

8 years ago

The GT40 had nothing to do with the demise of the Grand Sport Corvettes. The program was killed by General Motors management, due to their commitment to the AMA ban on factory-backed racing. In the 1950s, the AMA (Automobile Manufacturers Association) decided that factory-sponsored racing encouraged unsafe driving habits, and all manufacturers agreed to stop their factory racing programs. Not long after that, Ford and Chrysler decided to ignore the ban, but GM management enforced it through the ’60s. In the early ’60s, the Grand Sport Corvettes were being developed on the side, and I think they ran one race before GM management got wind of the program and shut it down.

Guitar Slinger
Guitar Slinger
8 years ago

Ahem !

From the Department of Corrections ;

The fact is the ban on racing came well before the GS ever came into being . Fact is the GS was a deeply underground project within GM well hidden by all those involved with Duntov at the helm . Fact is once GM’s mucky mucks caught wind of the GS [ which was intended to stem the Cobra tide ] the project was cut off at the knees leaving only five completed of which only two ever competed … unofficially . Fact is by the time a racing program once again came under GM review because no one else was obeying the AMA ban the GT40 was in full swing and winning leaving GM rightfully or wrongly once again refusing to get behind any kind of serious program involving the Corvette or the mid engined prototype they had in the pipeline and under consideration as a full blown LeMans race car because they felt the chances of competing with the GT40 head to head was an exercise in futility and the price was too high for the investors and board to accept .

So you’re both kind of right … and you’re both kind of wrong as well . Urban Myth and Wikipedia quasi information once again Trumping [ pun
intended ] the facts

Seriously … I’m glad to see someone else catch the Petro crew in an error [ with hopes on my part at least that those errors would become less frequent ] … but if’n y’alls gonna do so … at least be accurate yourself when you do .

8 years ago

Wow, with all those “fact is” remarks, it really sounds like you know what you’re talking about. Tell you what: you tell the story your way, and I’ll tell it the way that’s historically accurate. Have an awesome day!

Petrolicious Newsletter