Journal: Unplug and Hang On: Five Interesting Vintage Electric Cars

Unplug and Hang On: Five Interesting Vintage Electric Cars

By Michael Banovsky
July 10, 2015

Electric cars aren’t always boring, and they’re not all new, either. We’ve selected five of our favorites from years gone by, including an electric that was once the fastest car in the world and another that was conceived, designed, and built by a beloved Italian carrozzeria.

La Jamais Contente

“The car in which you travel seems to leave the ground and hurl itself forward like a projectile ricocheting along the ground. As for the driver, the muscles of his body and neck become rigid in resisting the pressure of the air; his gaze is steadfastly fixed about 200 yards ahead; his senses are on the alert.”

That’s what inventor, racer, and pilot of La Jamais Contente (The Never Satisfied) said of the experience driving his creation to speeds in excess of 100 km/h (62 mph)—the first man-made machine to do so.

And it is electric.

The same length as a modern Toyota Yaris, it weighed an incredible 1,450 kg (3,200 lbs), and output from the two electric traction motors was 50 kW (~67 horsepower). It was quite advanced for its day, too. Working with noted coachbuilder Rothschild, it constructed a bullet-shaped pod that covered the batteries, Jenatzy’s lower torso…and little else. Skinned in partinium, a light alloy of aluminum, tungsten, and magnesium, it’s considered to be the first streamlined vehicle. Michelin supplied the tires—distinctly low profile and modern-looking compared to the carriage-like wheels vehicles used at that time.

Set during a speed duel with rival manufacturer Jeantaud, as records were done in the day, his record stood at 105.882 km/h (65.792 mph), the last electric car to hold the title of “World’s Fastest Car”.

Zagato Zele

Upon its first showing in 1972, enthusiasts were just as confused as you probably are now. However improbable you may think the Zagato Zele is, consider that it was shown as the fuel shortage alarm bells were ringing—and entered production in 1974, just as the world was locked in a fuel crisis.

Just as well, then, the rear-drive Zele accelerates on a scale reserved for geopolitics—its top speed of (at most) 50 mph (80 km/h) was reached quite slowly, even though the enthusiast-minded Italians had included four forward speeds and a two-step accelerator pedal in a bid to help acceleration. Range? About 80 km (50 miles).

Sold in three trims, 1000, 1500, and 2000, the Zele was—you guessed it—all electric and the top-trim Zele 2000 could have up to eight car batteries packed under the passenger compartment. Zagato was nice enough to include a boost switch that’d apparently weaken the motor’s magnetic fields in the field coils to produce less torque but a greater top speed. A little too Star Trek, perhaps?

“I’m givin’ her all she’s got, Captain!”

Since you’re now completely sold on the Zele, let me say it was imported and sold in the U.S. as the Elcar—and hey, it’s a Zagato! Consumer Reports tested the Elcar when it was new, saying, “The Elcar has yet another mark against it: Its suspension is too flimsy to cope with even the low level of performance of which the vehicle is capable. During hard braking tests from 30 mph, the front suspension collapsed, putting an empathetic end to our texting of the Elcar”.

That said, it’s the only electric car here to have been sold to the public.

General Motors Electrovair

To say EV development was in its infancy in the 1960s would be both true and false. We’re well aware that electric cars were in fact more numerous than gasoline vehicles at the turn of the 20th century—so it’s not like electric cars were a new thing in 1966. New developments included better batteries, control units, and electric motors, components that were very much in their infancy at that time. For example, the Electovair II didn’t even have regenerative brakes, a now-standard feature for EVs.

The first Electrovair, in 1964, was an interesting vehicle but not as impressive performance-wise as the second, built just two years after. If you’re on the fence about Chevrolet’s Volt or Bolt names, knowing they passed up “Electrovair” as a potential name should make you furious.

Even in a modern sense, the car gave good performance, with its top speed and all-electric performance matching up pretty well with even the Volt production car. Yes, the Electrovair II lacks Bluetooth, iPod jack, and the luggage space was filled with batteries, but the numbers it put up in testing were pretty good.

From a 115 horsepower AC electric motor and 532 volts of silver-zinc batteries, the car could hit 80 mph, and its range was between 40-80 miles on a six hour charge. At a “svelte” 1,000 lbs heavier than the gasoline Corvair, acceleration was about as brisk as a modern smart fortwo at 16 seconds from zero-to-62 mph.

Problem? After just 100 recharges, the batteries needed to be replaced. With an array of zinc and other chemicals sloshing around in the nose of the car I’m inclined to agree that modern energy storage is much improved. Amazingly, the car survives to this day!

AMC Amitron

The AMC Amitron is a car guy’s electric car.

Small, wide, light, and with the wheels pushed to the corners, the Amitron has the proportions of a classic Mini Cooper…if it was made of brie and squished into a wedge. It weighed just 1102 lbs., which is 220 lbs lighter than an Ariel Atom track car.

It was shorter than a modern smart fortwo and wide enough for three-wide seating, a trick that makes it quite practical. Even better? Its inflatable passenger seats were designed to save space when not in use.

The Amitron, shown in 1967 and the Electron, repainted red and shown again in 1977, showed other innovative concepts: two stage battery storage and regenerative braking, both firsts. Its combination of two nickel-cadmium batteries (city motoring) and two lithium batteries (used as a boost for highway driving) gave the car great range quoted as 150 miles with an average speed of 50 mph.

Of course, the twin AMC concepts never made production, but apparently the company was confident they’d hit on the right formula. Of course, other nascent, stillborn, and bankrupt car companies have said the same thing…

Ford Comuta

Ford says it designed the Comuta to hold two adults and two children (and not much else!) in 1/2 the space of a Cortina.

To do this, it started with packaging an array of lead-acid batteries under the floor, like so many electric cars that followed. This gives the most interior space, best handling, and allows for external dimensions to be quite tidy—heck, the Comuta’s hood is shorter than a Subway foot-long.

Ford’s idea with the Comuta was to design a compact and city-friendly runabout that could be used for short shopping trips to city centres around Europe, where space is much more of a concern than it is in the U.S. Ford in the U.S. supported its UK operations with the design and construction of six (!) Comuta prototypes.

Powered by four 12-volt, 85-amp lead-acid batteries, it could hit 37 mph…with a city driving range of just 37 miles. Even today, its specs would be O.K. for many inner city dwellers—with trips on the highway verboten.

Image Sources:

Join the Conversation
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5 years ago

You forgot to mention Porsches electric car from 1898(!)

Joe Barthlow
Joe Barthlow
6 years ago

let’s not forget the electric BMW 1602 shown at the ’72 Munich Olympics

Ian Miles
Ian Miles
8 years ago

“Also, hydrogen can’t be mined or grown” – Until recently. I was reading an article that discussed the possibility of producing hydrogen economically in about 5 years, using some form of biological production. Still requires an infrastructure but unless there is a complete revolution in battery tech then seems to be the way to go.
In Denmark where much of the electricity produced is either renewable of very clear you see wealthy people driving about in their Tesla saloons, feeling very clever and self important. They usually drive about 15 miles, 99\% of the time, the cars have one occupant and thus render any residual benefit of Tesla redundant. Better of buying a Blue Motion Polo.

Guitar Slinger
Guitar Slinger
8 years ago

Uh oh . EV’s . Another soapbox of mine . Promise I’ll keep this succinct ;

Would you like to know what has me rolling on the floor in laughter [ or sometimes beating the floor in anger ] every time I hear the likes of Musk etc extolling the virtues of EV’s proclaiming them to be the vehicles of the future ?

The simple engineering fact that todays EV’s have the exact same problems as every single solitary EV for the last 115 years .

Namely ; Range – Storage – Battery life as well as disposal – Complexity – Excess Weight – Cost – Pollution created in manufacturing and Disposal – Lack of infrastructure – Excess expense of creating the necessary infrastructure etc etc etc

In other words . Same as it ever was . Same as it ever will be . The future of EV’s being EV’s have no long term future . Don’t believe me ? Can’t say as I blame you . But errr .. would you be willing to believe ALL the engineers / product planners etc at …… BMW/MINI – Toyota – Daimler Benz – Honda/Acura – Nissan/Renault – VW/Audi etc etc etc ?

So what is the future you might ask ? The above along with Big Oil have already answered the question . To paraphrase a line from ” The Graduate ”

” One word son . Hydrogen ”

The best part ? Should all petrol fueled machines ever be banned ? At present prices your ICE classic can be converted to liquid hydrogen for a whopping cost of around $7-10k . And once Hydrogen is firmly in place according to BMW you can expect that cost to drop to around $1000 . Not to mention all the current infrastructure in place can be easily and cheaply converted and y’alls got yerselves the winner once the only remaining obstacle is conquered . Namely manufacturing cost .

Rant over . Coffee and Cronuts in the lobby .

Great post by the way even if it did get me on another one of my automotive soapboxes ! .. 😉

Ronnie M
Ronnie M
8 years ago
Reply to  Guitar Slinger

Most companies, including BMW, have either significantly reduced or abandon altogether the use of hydrogen in ICE applications. If you see the output figures for similar displacements, you’ll see why. Hydrogen is actually much more promising in a fuel cell/electric motor application. Hydrogen has the same problems that electric does though, mainly infrastructure. Also, hydrogen can’t be mined or grown. It still has to be produced like electricity.

Petrolicious Newsletter