

Sign up to receive the weekly newsletter featuring the very latest from Petrolicious. Don’t be left out—join the ranks of those who Drive Tastefully.
Already a member? Log in
We're glad you're back.
Not a member yet? Sign up
We'll get you back on track.
This morning, while cruising down the highway I came upon a 2007-2009 model year Nissan 350Z. I recognized the car’s year range from the mid-cycle refresh updates, which include a revised hood reminiscent of the older Z models, larger machine-polished five-spoke alloys, and more attractive xenon headlights and taillights.
Now, the early 350Z is by no means “ugly,” but Nissan did a spectacular job refreshing the Z. The surprisingly unmodified and spotlessly clean black example I ran across caught my eye this morning—and a 350Z normally doesn’t. It got me thinking, “Man, they really nailed that refresh.”
Shortly after, once the coffee started turning gears, it dawned on me: many enthusiasts think that original designs often can’t be improved up. So I started thinking, “What other cars look better after a mid-cycle refresh?”
It certainly took a minute, because I too tend to believe what’s originally released is hard to beat. Perhaps it’s a bit of regularity? We see the car for years in one light, so when a manufacturer goes about tweaking it, we freak out? I don’t know, but I started to recall a few cars that look better when the designers got the green light for plastic surgery.
I’m a tad biased because I owned a number of these, but the DC2 Honda Integra Type R is one of those cars that looks better post-facelift… or in this case… a backside enhancement—no, not like the Kardashian’s. You see, the ’96 spec Honda Integra Type R looks fine. In fact, I tend to believe it’s one of H-car’s finest from the ’90s. The 15” Enkei eight-spokes look sporty enough and the rest of the car looks stunning, especially in Championship White.
Here’s the mid-cycle refresh for the model. It’s subtle, but it’s certainly an improvement. The fascia was left alone with the exception of factory projector HIDs—the lens have a circle etched in front of the projector to distinguish the look from the early standard lamps. The wheels were bumped up to 16×7” ten-spoke units that really improve the car’s stance by filling out the wheelwell a bit more. That rear-end treatment though? Biggest improvement. Again, it’s not loud, likely unnoticeable at first glance to those non-ITR fanatics, but the rear bumper is slightly taller—as in, it hangs lower to the ground. From the profile, it helps level the side skirt with the back of the car and from the rear a faux diffuser adds some flair and compliments the rather tall factory wing.
Another car I believe looks better post facelift is the Ferrari Testarossa. Now, the original is perfectly ’80s. With its boxy Pininfarina body, flip-up headlamps, and massive side blades—known to “slice like a ninja, cut like a razor blade… so fast”—the original iteration of the Testarossa is fine. Small alterations were made throughout production—not in one swift update—such as the painted front lower valance, larger diameter wheels, and two mirrors.
Now, as fond as I am with classics with just one side view mirror, the Testarossa’s high-mounted driver’s-side-only unit (yes, like the one on Miami Vice) always looked quirky to me. A later ’Rossa with two mirrors mounted down low, where they should have always been mounted? Yes, please, and thank you! Now, the 512TR revisions? Uh…
Finally, one of my very favorite saloons came to mind—the E38 BMW 7-series. To this day, I think a 2001 BMW 740i M Sport is the greatest sedan ever to rein from Munich—over any M5 (put down the pitchforks…you can’t shank me through the internet).
Now, that’s not to say when it debuted in 1994, it was perfect. I’m sure it was fine back in the ’90s, but unpainted side skirts and half painted bumpers on a Bavarian flagship? Unacceptable! 1998 brought the first major aesthetic changes, often referred to as the mid-life facelift: more attractive tail lights helped out back, while the glass rectangular headlights were ditched in favor of plastic units, but featured Xenon projector low beams with a squinted lens look—which became BMW’s corporate headlight shape for the early 2000s.
The ’98 mid-life facelift was an improvement, but the E38 still had that “unfinished” look thanks to the unpainted plastic cladding. Thankfully, for the final production year, BMW fixed this by offering full color-matched bumpers and skirts, and offered the M Sport model with “Shadowline” window and bumper trim (black in place of chrome), and machine polished 18” M Parallel wheels. All of which were great improvements over the original design.
The Nissan 350Z, Honda Integra Type R, Ferrari Testarossa, and BMW E38 7 series are just a few examples of mid-cycle alterations done right. What says ye, readers? What vehicles do you think were better off after factory updates? Let us know in the comments!
Photos courtesy of Honda, Nissan, BMW, Porsche
The Porsche 944 turbo/S2 looks so much better than the earlier cars, with the much more integrated front bumper design and rear valance which gives the car a much cleaner and more visually muscular look.
And since there seem to be a number of Alfa 156 owners on here ( I’m one too), I prefer the earlier nose and tail treatment. The facelift taillights had the slope reversed so it kinda makes the rear of the car look slightly flabby rather than tight and lean.
Mercedes does it all the time. The w124, w210, w211, w204, w212 all excellent facelifts. Others that have caught my eye, probably the Carina GT refresh, at210, the LandCruiser j78 Prado, both made significant changes which kinda keep the two still fresh. Check even the new Toyota Premio and Allion nzt260, brilliantly done.
I think the Alfa 159 was a truly inspired up date of the 156 idea but could never have the same impact of the original.I don’t know if that counts but it is more similar concept visually than say an e23 and e30. like a good cover tune It has the perfect balance of elements of the original and something new. I don’t know if it counts as an update or a new model, but if not, then I’ll have to hit you with the queen of updates, the ’68 Citroen ds.
I think the S2000 ap2 looks better than the ap1, the mid cycle refresh of the 90-91 crx was a nice subtle change for the front clip and the rear lights. The NSX feels like it was better before the pre 2000 facelift, but i’m partial to pop ups. 🙂
As for the Z i like the 370 more than the 350, the 370 has more of the silhouette of the 240 Z which is still the best looking Z .
The new Audi R8 doesn’t look as good as the first generation, which is weird because they look similar but somewhere they lost the plot.
great article, andrew
as a z guy (73 240z and 07 350 grand touring), of course this was read immediately. the bulge in the hood for the ’07, ’08 model year (’09 was the first 370z), is how i too start to distinguish. part of this was due to the introduction of the engine design going to dual air intakes and revised plenum…they simply went to pay homage to the first gen z’s with the bulge, which really sets the car off. i also have a first gen 2000 xterra v-6/six speed; it’s hood was like the first 350’s yet they added a power bulge when the v-6 was revised. this gave the x a bit of a refreshing as well, along with round headlights and a revised grille.
the pic nissan sent you of the sunset z was actually the track model (brembo brakes, rayes forged wheels, underbody diffusers) which made way to the grand touring. personally, the rays wheels and brembo brake package stand out the most from any of the z’s.
you are spot on related to all three pieces you referenced. often, and most successfully, it’s normally subtle. all three manufacturers were extremely successful with these.
luv the variety in which y’all bring interesting articles to us.
We’re all taking big cars here, but my first thought went out the the little Italian convertible: the Fiat Barchetta. That facelift turned a well proportioned car into a piece of perfection (a small piece though!)
My second thought went to a real obvious one, the Mazda MX-5, this car has remained largely unchanged for its entire production run, but each facelift/”new model ” send to improve again and again
Then I feel very sad for you, as petrolhead (which I shall dangerously assume you are, considering the website you are visiting), then you cannot see that sometimes a revision on a nice car can actually make it that much better.
Now I know that the article writer is talking about older genration vehicles, but it can also apply to more recent cars, for example, I now drive a 2017 Kia Cerato/ Forte5 (look at the Australian Kia site to see the design and I think this design is a huge improvement on the 2015 model, the front end has much better lines and a more aggressive face. Schreyer and his team have got it sorted.
Somebody here mentioned the Lotus Esprit, and I fully agree.
While I love the simplicity of the old cars (the original 911, Mini, BMW 2002, etc. ) I think there are quite a few whose successors are better lookers. The 997 to the 991, for instance. Or the C6 to C7 Vettes, perhaps even the new NSX, Civics, and Accords. But, I these are all improvements done with facelifts, nothing radical. The only one that comes to mind in that respect is the new electric Morgan 3 wheeler with a whole new drive train and concept beautifully integrated into its heritage. I think its looks rival, and in some ways exceed, the aesthetics of the classic petrol version.
While you are at it, may I ask how you determined that the Integra is not worthy of a feature? Do you have some sort of judging criteria?
As for boring, you are entitled to your opinion. I just wished you had kept it to yourself. We are in the Petrolicious channel after all – a channel for people who I presume to aim to be tasteful.