Journal: Driven by Design: BMC Mini

Driven by Design: BMC Mini

Avatar By Yoav Gilad
February 23, 2014
7 comments

(This article is part of the Driven by Design series.)

Photography by Turbometal Motorblog for Petrolicious

I once drove a car for a week that everyone loved. This might sound like car-scribe hyperbole, but it’s a scientific fact. I know it’s a fact because every time I stopped at a traffic light the person in the car next to me would notice and then yell, “I love your car!” Which actually made me like the car less because an inevitable barrage of questions would immediately follow. Yes, it’s a Mini, it’s right-hand drive, it’s a 1970-something version, it’s very roomy inside and look the light is green! Oh, you have more questions? Great…

In all seriousness, I loved the car too in spite of the quasi-celebrity status it bestowed on me. I think it had a 1000cc engine and I could nearly touch the pavement when I stuck my hand out the window and reached down. To use the cliché, it handled like a go-kart and turned so quickly that it required braking only in order to answer questions.

Yet in many ways, the BMC Mini is similar to a few other cars: the Fiat Topolino and 500 and the Volkswagen Beetle. It helped to democratize the car in the UK and many other countries. Developed by the British Motor Corporation in response to the 1956 fuel crisis and the resulting resumption of fuel rationing in the UK, its design brief required it to be ten feet long or shorter and to have a passenger compartment at least six feet in length to fit four people.

While a few cars had used a transverse front engine package, it was the Mini’s resulting popularity and package efficiency that really made this configuration the standard that it is today. The Mini also redefined two-box styling by showing how it could look sporty.

Looking at a Mini in side view can be deceptive—at first glance, the car appears solid and well planted (and safer than it has any right to look). Additionally, the passenger compartment looks larger than it is. The wheels’ relatively small size contribute to this illusion as it looks like the car will barely move. But the main reason that the Mini looks like a small, nimble fortress is because of the welds running up the A- and C-pillars. Their angle extends the cabin visually at the front (making it appear larger) and as they spread apart at their base it makes the car look set.

Viewing the car from a front ¾ angle also makes the car look firmly grounded because of the length to width proportion. And while on many other front-engine, front-wheel drive coupes a large greenhouse looks awkward and slow, the Mini’s narrow pillars, slight tumble-home, and ample body-side surfacing simply make the greenhouse lighter and the body more massive.

Surfacing was purposely kept simple and unadorned in order to decrease production costs and stamping failure rates. This however, should not be misconstrued as a negative; The Mini’s surfaces are elegant and functional if not exciting. More interesting are the details though.

Exposed, exterior hinges were used to decrease complexity in fabrication and cost. And in sharp contrast to the era, chrome was tastefully kept to a minimum. The most important exterior details are the aforementioned welds joining the body sides to the front and rear as they help give the Mini its aggressive stance.

In addition, there are a few thoughtful details worth mentioning in the interior: a centrally mounted gauge cluster was planned from the beginning to ease production of export models, sliding front windows were used in order to keep the doors hollow so that large door pockets would [marginally] increase storage space and a trunk lid that drops down (like a pick-up truck tailgate) to increase the trunk’s potential load space.

The original Mini is all about its interior space and if you’ve ever had the chance to sit in one, you’d be amazed by just how roomy it is. Obviously, you’ll never mistake it for a Mercedes S-class, but given that it’s only ten feet long, the Mini is a masterpiece of efficiency. And in some ways it proves that something has been lost since then. Just sit in a new Mini Cooper if you’d like a compelling counterpoint.

Sir Francis Bacon once said “there is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion.” If that is the case then I cannot find the strangeness to the Mini. It embodies simplicity, efficiency, and fun in an attractive, flexible package and that is why everyone, including me, loves it. Hopefully, now that you’ve read this, you’ll let me go when the light changes green.

Join the Conversation
Related

Leave a Reply

Msjesse
Msjesse

A miniac, here is my Tiny Tows

Robert Sheppard
Robert Sheppard

Brilliant to see the mini appreciated over there in the States. I’ve got two of these babys in the UK (a 1969 Copper and a 1960 Austin Seven Mini) and whilst the car in the article looks like it’s got a few non-original bits, it really doesn’t matter. I love the fact that it is being enjoyed as it should be. Whatever it takes to keep cars like this on the road – that’s where they belong!

Carlos Pinto
Carlos Pinto

Great Video, bad description.

This is not a Mini Cooper. It’s a Mini 1000. You should correct the title of the video.

JB21
JB21

Sorry, what video? Am I missing something?

Todd Dunning

Carlos – speaking as a 1964 Mk1 Cooper owner, you should lighten the hell up and thank Petrolicious for a great little article. Badging and naming conventions are notoriously confused on these cars and for all we know it’s a Cooper with 1000 badges.

BillamJunior
BillamJunior

My mini has finally arrived, my dad and I drove over the country to get her and bring her back!! Little 850cc engine a dream, plenty for a first car! The old Bakelite wheel, the single dial, the cream seats…. The list goes on… Cant believe she is mine, have a couple of jobs to do then will take it up the country tracks and get some photos to send.

Dustin Rittle
Dustin Rittle

I for one have always been a Mini fan. The the proportions just seem right to me and with great handling and light weight its a hard combo to beat. I always believed it was the car that ushered in the front wheel drive movement will still see to this day. They were also a damn good race car as well. The Mini Cooper S did very well at the Monte Carlo rally.