

Sign up to receive the weekly newsletter featuring the very latest from Petrolicious. Don’t be left out—join the ranks of those who Drive Tastefully.
Already a member? Log in
We're glad you're back.
Not a member yet? Sign up
We'll get you back on track.
Photography by Rémi Dargegen and Daniil Matyash
Alright, Petrolisti, time to mobilize the community! I need your help, and all of your auto enthusiasts’ friends help (and their friends, and their friends’ friends too) in overturning an unjust law. On Monday, we asked you what car you’d like to import, never sold in the US, that is more than twenty-five years old.
For those of you who aren’t familiar, the United States has an almost blanket ban on importing all vehicles younger than twenty-five years old. Land of the free, my foot! With very few exceptions, you can’t just import a car from another part of the world until it has turned twenty-five years old. And it’s about protectionism. But not about protecting occupants or even the environment. The law was passed in the 1980s when fluctuations in the currency exchange rates could provide massive profits to an importer over the manufacturer that originally made the car. Remember the term “grey market”? Well, the automakers didn’t like it, and so lobbied our government to make it much tougher to do this. How much tougher? You’d have to really want a particular “unobtanium” car. Like really, really want. And you’d have to have the money, time, and resources (read that as $$$$) to get it federalized to drive it legally on our roads. I won’t go into the specifics, but the maze of bureaucracy made me give up the dream. But as a well read, and perhaps well travelled car enthusiast, there will probably be a time when you too hear the call from a car built in a distant land. But currently there is no easy way to do this. Unless we overturn this law.
But why? Our friends to the north in Canada can import vehicles aged fifteen years or more, and in other parts of the world, such as Europe and Japan, legalizing almost any non-approved car is easy. All they want to do is check that it has lights and brakes, and a little bit of paperwork. Both Europe and Japan also have special allowances for low volume imports. There is no rational reason we couldn’t give approval to European certified cars. German TUV approvals are tougher than our own, and include rear collision and rollover standards we don’t perform. In fact, a global standard for safety and crash testing would make a lot of sense, and save the manufacturers time and money. But that’s a conversation for a different day.
Early in 2013 I tried my hand at effecting legislative change. I sought to overturn the law, or at least begin the conversation towards that and thus started a petition at Whitehouse.gov (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov), and seeded it to the auto enthusiast community. If a petition meets the signature threshold, it will be reviewed by the President’s office and they will issue a response.
It failed.
To receive a response, a petition must reach 100,000 signatures within thirty days. That’s a high bar by any stretch of the imagination. Perhaps there wasn’t enough buzz about it, and perhaps more importantly it wasn’t clear to the average American car buyer, used to buying a new Camry or Accord off a dealer’s lot, why not being able to import a Porsche 959, Lancia Delta Integrale, Audi RS2, or Nissan Skyline was and is important. The law was created decades ago when the exchange rate could have provided an advantage to an importer over the manufacturer, however that is no longer an issue. In fact, most cars are much less expensive in the USA.
I am pushing for a change in the law from the twenty-five year limit to fifteen. Meaning that right now, the newest car you could import would be a 1999 instead of a 1989. I realize the number of people who truly care about this is minimal, but if we generate enough buzz it should be possible. Many people may never personally import a car, but at least they would have the ability to do it. The worst that could happen would be that a few handfuls of car nuts would be driving around in some weird cars from the ’90s. And that would be a beautiful thing.
So join me, friends in signing this petition, and pass it on to your friends, and so on and so forth, and let us reminisce the eloquent words of William “Braveheart” Wallace.
“…And dying in your bed many years from now, with your stack of well read auto periodicals knee deep, would you be willing to trade all the domestically produced Camrys, Accords, and Fusions from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here as young men and tell our government that they may take our non-conforming imports but they will never take our freedom!”
Sign the petition HERE! And if you’re curious what we’d import (after signing the petition of course) click here.
Images Sources: oldcarmanualproject.com, 2009gtr.com
JOIN THE REVOLUTION, SIGN THE PETITION AND WEAR THE SHIRT TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT.
http://teespring.com/Legalize_R34-GTR
Benjamin,
If the petition fails this time, let’s try starting with a FB page to build a following, then announce the 30 day window we’re aiming for. And simultaneously search for the right angle to make inroads on the Congressional front. We may need to try pushing it through each of our own senators to generate some interest/activity.
Those are just my thoughts. Apologies for repetition due to my failure to read all comments first.
V/R,
Ché
I remember being an exchange student in Germany in 1985, when the dollar was so strong. that year, you could by a Porsche 944 for about $14,000 in Germany, then ship it back yourself for a couple grand. Not that I did that, but I fantasized about it at the time…
And while I admire your initiative, this White House petition thing is just BS. Even if you did get 100,000 signatures, the President cannot do anything about it. It requires an act of Congress, which is a much steeper hill.
It would be awesome to see a response from this. Being stationed overseas for a short period of time and falling in love with a car that you can’t eventually bring back under the current circumstances is a huge bummer. At the end of my assignment I’d love to be able to bring back my ’95 Crown Majesta. I know plenty of service members who would love to do the same.
This — “Importers of grey-market vehicles have been targeted by monies taxpayers have intended to be used to secure our country against terrorist activity” — is tea party bullshit; there is no reason to politicize this petition. But the petition idea is great. I signed in and will share on Facebook. The law can be limited to vehicles brought in for personal use to freeze our dealers.
The law was passed to stop the “grey marketers” because of abuses. Those importers were using a rule that allowed imports of recent-vintage cars – if the importers replaced all the parts of the car with parts to make the cars match US laws. At the time, US automakers had to meet stricter standards here than in foreign markets, and most of the cars brought over under those rules did not meet them. And rarely did these importers actually convert the cars as required, they just filled out paperwork saying that they had.
But conditions are different now, with safety, emissions, and other rules more similar around the world. The reasons for cars not being exported to the US are more for marketing reasons now, not governmental standards. The rule should be lifted.
Jalopnik is as of now pushing the petition as well ;
But … in the interest of knowledge last night I asked for an opinion or two on why this stupid law exists and why every previous … no matter how well funded ..attempt to repeal it has failed so miserably . Though still just speculation on the part of those who answered .. all came up with the same answer independently ;
They all agreeing it is both the domestic as well as foreign auto manufactures that A) Created the law and B) Are working so hard to maintain it . Why ? Because … they perceive that the repeal of this law would seriously damage their sales . How you may ask ? Well .. sure if this law were to go away a lot of exotics and classics that would have no effect on new car sales would come here . But …. it would also allow folks to buy cars such as ; Land Rover Defenders / Toyota FJ’s & Hiluxs / 2dr and base model Mercedes G-Wagons – Aussie Utes [ Chicken tax applies here ] – Fords Ranger and SUV based on it sold overseas [ Chicken tax again ] – Mexican built original Beetles and Brazilian built T2’s etc . All of which the manufactures see [ and IMO legitimately so ] as damaging their new car sales .
So … its not just the US Government you’re fighting with this … Its Big Business e.g. all the auto manufactures doing business in the US as well . Which … if this is true … and all bets are that it is … we’re fighting a losing battle . Unfortunately . Apologies for being the bearer of such bad news . Sigh …..
Why 15 years ?
O.T.:
A new standard Merceds CLA 250, costs 109792.55 USD in Denmark.
It costs 29900 USD in the US.
Veterancar status comes after 35(!) years, and it’s not getting that much cheaper 🙁
That’s very effective in keeping interesting cars out, and getting people to buy as cheap and boring, as poosible.
I also applaud and support the effort and hope you will succeed. I added my enthusiastic and hopeful signature. And, what do they say: “if you don’t succeed at first – try again, and again and again” After all we have everything to gain, the only “risk” the disappointment followed by the hope of a new try.
Get Ford involved. They’re supporting the US-EU free trade agreement and harmonization of safety standards. If you can tag on to that a revised understanding about how a classic is defined, that might help. I agree it’s an uphill battle. Dealing with the auto unions is a big obstacle to getting that main deal agreed.
100,000 is a daunting number of signatures but I don’t think it’s impossible. I’m on a few different car forums and Facebook groups with 1,000+ members. If every Petrolicious reader shared this with their car loving friends and family and in turn they shared it, I think it’s definitely possible!
First of all … I agree 100\% …. and Second .. I applaud your efforts . But unfortunately I have to tell you its all been tried many times before and failed miserably each and every time .. both on an individual basis [ remember the Bristol 411 Series III or VI I want ? ] and collectively … pun not intended . The reason(s) why being so convoluted .. obscured and opaque as to be utterly incomprehensible regardless of ones financial status , legal … or even political connections . Fact is I’m not entirely sure having dealt with this issue personally [ and collectively ] that anyone within the ranks of the US Government can even understand it all … never mind being able to explain it to any of us .
But try again by all means . You’ve got my full support . Just don’t be too disappointed if it all goes awry in the end like each previously attempt has .. despite the bags of money that was behind them [ and I do mean bags ]